From: | Heather McLeod-Kilmurray <Heather.Mcleod-Kilmurray@uottawa.ca> |
To: | Neil Foster <Neil.Foster@newcastle.edu.au> |
obligations@uwo.ca | |
Date: | 20/01/2009 14:15:25 UTC |
Subject: | RE: duty owed to drunk hotel patron |
HI Neil – 4 of 9 judges (44%) on the
Supreme Court of Canada are women at the moment – and the Chief Justice
is Beverley McLachlin
From: Neil
Foster [mailto:Neil.Foster@newcastle.edu.au]
Sent: January 19, 2009 7:49 PM
To: obligations@uwo.ca
Subject: ODG: duty owed to drunk
hotel patron
Dear
Colleagues;
Interesting decision of the Full Court of the Supreme Court of Tasmania on
appeal in Scott v C. A. L. No 14 Pty Ltd (No 2) [2009] TASSC 2 (19 January
2009) http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/tas/TASSC/2009/2.html .
Owner of a hotel found liable for damages to the widow of a motor-bike rider
who died in a road accident while drunk, after leaving the pub. Strong dissent
from the Chief Justice, Crawford CJ, referring to the High Court of Australia
decision in Cole v South Tweed Heads Rugby
League Football Club Ltd (2004) 217 CLR 469 which seems
on first glance to be on point and to the contrary. But I must concede that the
majority here are correct to say that the HC did not actually hold in Cole that there could be no duty of
care.
The
facts of this case are important. The deceased had previously, before getting
drunk, actually arranged for the publican to store his motorbike in a cupboard,
to which the publican had the only key, on the understanding that the publican
would later call the deceased's wife to come and pick him up. But having
achieved the requisite state of intoxication, the deceased changed his mind,
demanded and was given the bike back, and set off. There is also an interesting
debate about whether the publican could have resisted returning the bike (the
subject of a bailment at will, I guess) or not. If he was been legally obliged
to return it, can he be said to have not to been reasonable in withholding
it? Can an action which is "reasonable" be also illegal?
Either
way I have a pretty strong suspicion this decision, if it went on appeal,
would be overturned by the High Court. But you never know, of course. With the
imminent departure of Kirby J (I think Feb 2 is the final day) it is very hard
to predict what the newly constituted Court will do with tort decisions
(Justice Virginia Bell from the NSWCA, who will replace Kirby J, is
regarded as a criminal law expert, so not a lot of information there that I am
aware of in previous decisions.)
As
a matter of interest, the High Court will, at that stage, contain 3 women out
of the 7 Justices: is there a higher percentage of women in any other final
court of appeal around the Commonwealth world?
Regards
Neil
F
Neil
Foster
Senior
Lecturer, LLB Program Convenor
Faculty of Business & Law
MC158,
Callaghan NSW 2308
ph 02 4921 7430
fax 02 4921 6931